Ken, Dave et al continue to do a stellar job keeping HPR in good order and making it a shining example of cooperation and information sharing amongst several intersecting communities.

I do however have to stress, there is nothing whatsoever constructive in the motives of whoever submitted the shows in question as the topic of this show.

If what I'm gathering from this show (and I could be wrong) is the issue making the shows submitted problematic both ethically and potentially even legally for HPR and its volunteer staff, the person(s) submitting such content are in no way shape or form a Gadfly as they appear to have claimed.

They are. Just. A Troll.

The term Gadfly, used in the intended context, is very specific.

A Gadfly is someone who asks potentially upsetting questions, usually to authorities, at THEIR OWN risk, in the pursuit of truth.

Attempting to put others (I.E. the HPR staff) at risk by using them as a platform to spread what is essentially hate speech, be it in seriousness or just to cause upset, is just trolling.

Nothing more, nothing less.

Ken and Dave are (rightfully) careful in how they discuss the situation, and I do believe, in so far as HPR show output is concerned, they have taken the right approach.

Well done.