[Hpr] owning binrev

slick0 slick0 at slick0.net
Fri May 6 07:32:38 PDT 2011

I imagine part of the confusion was how HPR came about during the ending 
(merging) of both binrev radio and TWATech radio.  Both had their roots, 
but having them merge as something new could be seen as somewhat of a 
rejuvenation effort to keep things going full force without the starting 

I myself have never thought of HPR as not being a part of binrev, the 
idea is just alien to me. That said, I can understand how it could be 
lost to the listeners if it's never mentioned. Certainly, many of the 
friendships I've made in the hacker community are thanks in part to 
binrev. If not for binrev radio and 2600 as insparation, and binrev's 
ddp hack radio as a platform, basenet would likely have never bothered 
starting, and I similarly would have never bothered with any 
conferences, etc.

If you want me to do any voice overs for HPR with the binrev name, etc, 
just let me know and I'll get right on it. Let's get this brand pushed!


On 5/2/2011 8:24 AM, Klaatu wrote:
> My first attempt at sending this email either failed or got summarily 
> ignored.  I'm sending again, just in case it was the former.
> Ken's recent Interview With Stankdawg drove home the point that a lot 
> of new listeners of HPR don't actually realize that HPR is and always 
> has been a BinRev project.  I think this is a bit of a shame for two 
> reasons:
> 1. A lot of us as podcasters and hackers were incredibly influenced by 
> binrev radio.  I myself count Stankdawg as one of my primary 
> influences and he even gets the very dubious honor of being the reason 
> I record myself in glorious 8000hz and pimp a proper lo-fi sound.
> and..
> 2. binrev is a strong and important "brand" - it has been around a 
> long time now; along with 2600, it's done a lot for the "hacker" image 
> and sense of identity, and it's an important part of HPR as well as 
> hacker tradition and history.
> In short, I think we should take ownership of our heritage.
> It has often puzzled me, actually, as to why HPR was positioned as a 
> separate entitiy from binrev; I kind of assumed that BinRev wanted to 
> be a more or less invisible sponsor, and maybe early on it did help 
> more people find HPR by having it as its own thing.  But I think HPR 
> and BinRev are both being hurt by not claiming affiliation and 
> capitalizing on the BinRev brand.
> For instance, I have recently done an outro without the "Sponsored by 
> Caro dot net" part; it would be trivial to add something like "HPR is 
> a part of the Binary Revolution...blah blah blah" -- or whatever.  I 
> don't know if it would also be significant to add some subtext to the 
> Hacker Public Radio logo or title graphic that states it is a "A 
> Binary Revolution Project" or something like that.  I don't know, I 
> don't want to go overboard but I do think a little more 
> acknowledgement could be good.
> Anyone else thinking in this direction or am I just spouting off 
> rhetoric from marketing class?
> -- klaatu
> -- 
> ---
> uzu linukso. subtenu libera programaro.
> kotizu al oggcastplanet.org/gnuWorldOrder 
> <http://oggcastplanet.org/gnuWorldOrder>
> fedorareloaded.com <http://fedorareloaded.com>
> _______________________________________________
> Hpr mailing list
> Hpr at hackerpublicradio.org
> http://hackerpublicradio.org/mailman/listinfo/hpr_hackerpublicradio.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://hackerpublicradio.org/pipermail/hpr_hackerpublicradio.org/attachments/20110506/d2223353/attachment-0006.html>

More information about the Hpr mailing list