[Hpr] owning binrev
dosman at packetsniffers.org
Fri May 6 10:40:58 PDT 2011
I second what slick0 said.
And if you want more people to know it's a BinRev project then put a
banner on the front page that says "A BinRev Project". As far as the
content, if people recording shows want to bump it I think that's
their call, it's never been an issue before. Make some content or
On May 6, 2011, at 10:32 AM, slick0 wrote:
> I imagine part of the confusion was how HPR came about during the
> ending (merging) of both binrev radio and TWATech radio. Both had
> their roots, but having them merge as something new could be seen as
> somewhat of a rejuvenation effort to keep things going full force
> without the starting points.
> I myself have never thought of HPR as not being a part of binrev,
> the idea is just alien to me. That said, I can understand how it
> could be lost to the listeners if it's never mentioned. Certainly,
> many of the friendships I've made in the hacker community are thanks
> in part to binrev. If not for binrev radio and 2600 as insparation,
> and binrev's ddp hack radio as a platform, basenet would likely have
> never bothered starting, and I similarly would have never bothered
> with any conferences, etc.
> If you want me to do any voice overs for HPR with the binrev name,
> etc, just let me know and I'll get right on it. Let's get this brand
> On 5/2/2011 8:24 AM, Klaatu wrote:
>> My first attempt at sending this email either failed or got
>> summarily ignored. I'm sending again, just in case it was the
>> Ken's recent Interview With Stankdawg drove home the point that a
>> lot of new listeners of HPR don't actually realize that HPR is and
>> always has been a BinRev project. I think this is a bit of a shame
>> for two reasons:
>> 1. A lot of us as podcasters and hackers were incredibly influenced
>> by binrev radio. I myself count Stankdawg as one of my primary
>> influences and he even gets the very dubious honor of being the
>> reason I record myself in glorious 8000hz and pimp a proper lo-fi
>> 2. binrev is a strong and important "brand" - it has been around a
>> long time now; along with 2600, it's done a lot for the "hacker"
>> image and sense of identity, and it's an important part of HPR as
>> well as hacker tradition and history.
>> In short, I think we should take ownership of our heritage.
>> It has often puzzled me, actually, as to why HPR was positioned as
>> a separate entitiy from binrev; I kind of assumed that BinRev
>> wanted to be a more or less invisible sponsor, and maybe early on
>> it did help more people find HPR by having it as its own thing.
>> But I think HPR and BinRev are both being hurt by not claiming
>> affiliation and capitalizing on the BinRev brand.
>> For instance, I have recently done an outro without the "Sponsored
>> by Caro dot net" part; it would be trivial to add something like
>> "HPR is a part of the Binary Revolution...blah blah blah" -- or
>> whatever. I don't know if it would also be significant to add some
>> subtext to the Hacker Public Radio logo or title graphic that
>> states it is a "A Binary Revolution Project" or something like
>> that. I don't know, I don't want to go overboard but I do think a
>> little more acknowledgement could be good.
>> Anyone else thinking in this direction or am I just spouting off
>> rhetoric from marketing class?
>> -- klaatu
>> uzu linukso. subtenu libera programaro.
>> kotizu al oggcastplanet.org/gnuWorldOrder
>> Hpr mailing list
>> Hpr at hackerpublicradio.org
> Hpr mailing list
> Hpr at hackerpublicradio.org
More information about the Hpr